Let's Talk

20 years of
Living Theology in the Metropolitan Chicago Synod since 1996

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Welcome to Let’s Talk 2020
    • 22. 2 Reformation Jubilee 500
    • 22.1 Death and Dying
    • All Issues 1996 – present
  • Noted Guest Authors
  • About
  • Contact

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / The Church and Salvation / More Sweat Than Blood

More Sweat Than Blood

May 24, 2016 by Editorial Council

Let’s Talk thanks Carl Isaacson for putting blood and passion into our synodical theological dialog. We trust all will understand that irony can be irritating and still be irenic.
Some slightly less bloody responses:

  • Maxine Washington was the author of the article–noted only in editorial brackets in Carl’s piece. Granted, she was writing as a member of the Bishop’s Office, but it was clearly her voice. And good theological dialog acknowledges persons. Isn’t all theology embodied interpretation for the sake of obedience?
  • We must all beware of reading cement into liquid words. Our sister confessed missing Sunday worship in a rough first month on the job. Ask her if she was writing this article itself “on the fly.” Ask her where and how else she may have been gladly hearing and learning God’s Word that month. And let us ask ourselves how we check out self and others on the ways we honor days à la Romans 14.
  • Hidden in Carl’s own irony is the implicit message that, if our sister did set a bad example by neglecting worship during a time fraught with anxieties, there is another, perhaps more alarming bad example set by a system of episcopacy that is not adequately mobilized to lift burdens and administer the gospel and sacraments apposite to real-life brokenness or bent-ness. How can the pastor-for-the-pastors better help people caught fretting over their sense of call? Let’s not miss that message.
  • Such a real-life gospel-centeredness is perhaps the difference between authority, which we need more of from every Bishop’s office, and authoritarianism, which we could do with less of. We all seem to be looking for a sure center to our theology and rhetoric. “Salvation by grace through faith for the sake of Christ” is a great one. The reason it seems so dissatisfying when we apply it to real-life is that it has this irritating tendency to undermine all of our attempts to find final answers to practical problems—such as whether we really, really have an inner call to anything. Then it is not doctrine, but narrative, that emboldens us to sin and sin boldly but believe in God’s grace more boldly still. Something to which Maxine may have been testifying in her article.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: The Church and Salvation


Let’s Talk welcomes thoughtful responses to our articles from all readers. Post your thoughts on our Facebook page or scroll down to the bottom to leave a comment.

Subscriber Sign-up

1.4 September 1996

In This Issue

How is the Church Necessary for Salvation? The Church as God’s Well of Possibility

By Philip Hefner

How is the Synod Necessary for Salvation?

By Kenneth Olsen

Ecclesiology: Listening to the Laity

By Cheryl Stewart Pero

A Community of Proclamation and Service

By Kwang-Ja Yu

Word, Sacrament, and Mission in the Metro Chicago Synod

By Ruben Duran

Bleeding on the Page for the Sake of Theology

By Carl Isaacson

More Sweat Than Blood

By Editorial Council